THE RESEARCH DESK FOR COMMERCIAL HVAC PLATFORMSUPDATED OCT 20, 2026

09 · Scorecard

How is a criterion rated?

  • Bid Assembly research desk
  • Section 09
  • Page 4 of 16
  • Updated Oct 20, 2026

Use the following 0–5 scale. Apply the criterion-specific descriptions below, and record whether evidence is a vendor claim, a documented contract term, an observed test or sustained operational use.

Rating General anchor
0 No usable evidence, or the requirement is contradicted
1 Claimed capability without relevant proof
2 Demonstrated on a limited or rehearsed example
3 Demonstrated on buyer-relevant work, with material gaps still identified
4 Agreed acceptance evidence supplied and tests passed for the bounded scope
5 Repeated evidence across the agreed variation, with operational ownership and changes tested

A long proposal is not automatically stronger evidence. For commercial criteria, documentary proof and contract commitments may be more relevant than a software demonstration.

Sources cited on this page

No external sources are cited on this page. Every source for this section is listed on its Sources page.

Search research, tools and reference products.